Dec
16

Yet more dog food recalled

This is just a quick post to address the most recent dog food recall. I actually wasn’t going to post today, but then I saw this article and knew that I had to. Yeah, it’s yet another aflatoxin in corn recall. If you have any Dog Power Dog Food by Animal Nutrition, then you should definitely check out the article to see if what you have is one of the affected batches. They were apparently manufactured sometime between January 4 and November 18 of this year.

Like the other recalls, it seems that there haven’t been any actual health problems reported yet, but it’s always good to be on the safe side.

Apparently, this really only affects people in Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana. Given that the brand in the last post distributed their products in Louisiana and Texas, I have to say that I think Louisiana residents have really been getting the short end of the stick when it comes to dog food lately.

Dec
13

What is with all the dog food recalls lately?

I know that there have been recalls here and there over the years, including the infamous one in 2007, but it seems like there have been a surprising number happening in like the last month specifically. First there were those Chinese dog treats, then there was the Iams recall, and now a random company based out of Louisiana is issuing its own recall. If you have any Arrow Brand dog food produced between December 1, 2010 and December 1, 2011, then you should contact them to get a refund.

Weirdly, theirs doesn’t seem to be related to either of the other two recalls, though the article is a little vague on how the whole thing came about in this case. All it actually says is that the recall is due to high levels of aflatoxin in some of the corn used in the dog food. (It’s interesting that so many of the problems in these recalls seemed to be due to the grain-based ingredients in cheap dog food. I could hope that this would lead to fewer companies using such ingredients, which are not that healthy for dogs anyway, but I doubt that the money lost in the recall compares to the amount saved by using grains at all, given the way they’re subsidized.)

I find the large date range to be kind of disturbing — I mean, that’s a full year’s worth of dog food that people have been feeding their dogs that whole time, assuming it was perfectly safe for them. Fortunately, it sounds like no actual illnesses or health problems have come out of the whole thing, and that the company may simply be doing it to be cautious. It seems a bit late, but hey, at least they’re doing something about the problem, and they decided to do it of their own volition, instead of having to be forced to do it by an outside agency or something.

I swear, by the end of the year all the dog food in the country is going to have been recalled, and we’re all just going to have to feed our dogs exclusively on Christmas leftovers.

Dec
10

Did you know that dog poop poses a disease risk?

Yeah, I thought you probably did. I mean, I think most people are pretty well aware that leaving lots of poop lying around isn’t the key to good health, for dogs or humans.

However, I recently read an article seeking to make sure that we are all very aware of this point. It does have some details that I wasn’t specifically aware of, such as which diseases our dogs are most likely to get if you leave old dog poop lying around in the yard, so it isn’t completely silly.

The article also mentions a few more things I didn’t know, like the fact that there are apparently a number of people willing to let their dogs do their business in their own yards, but who still don’t want to clean it up themselves. One of the owners mentioned actually just sort of let the poop pile up (ew!), and his dog kept getting sick with the same disease over and over because of it (argh). This apparently still wasn’t enough to make him willing to pick it up himself, though, so he pays a service to come and pick up all the dog poop in his yard once a week. (The article does point out that really, these people should not be letting it sit around for even that long.)

This is just so utterly alien to me as an idea. I live in the city, so most non-dog-poop-picker-uppers are actually leaving the dog poop either the park or in someone else’s yard. And while having a dog walker come daily is a pretty common thing for some people, I’ve never really heard of anyone just letting their dog go in the yard every day for a week and then having someone else come in and pick it up. It’s just… odd, to me.

Anyway, I found it amusing how the article takes this tone like people who leave dog poop around are simply unaware of how disease-ridden it is and merely need to be informed in order to stop doing it. That’s way more generous than I would be. It did mention a pretty good strategy that one woman uses when she sees someone else with their dog about to leave the poop behind:

“When I see someone not picking up after their dogs, I will walk up to them and say, ‘Oh, did you forget a bag to pick up after your dog? That happens to me too. Here, have one of mine.’ So far, has worked every time.”

I can totally see this strategy working, because for the person to refuse they pretty much have to actively declare themselves to be one of those people who leave dog poop lying around, which most people aren’t going to do.

Now, this may work if you actually catch the person in the act. But what you do about people who leave dog poop behind before you can catch them? How can you figure out which people aren’t picking up after their dogs?

Why, DNA testing, of course!

Yeah, that’s not a joke. Apparently, some landlords are actually requiring all dog owning tenants to give a DNA sample from the dog when they move in. Then, if they find dog poop in the yard, they can have it tested against the samples in order to determine who left the dog poop behind. This allows the landlord to confront said tenants with evidence, and to threaten fines if they’re caught a second or third time.

According to the article, it’s been incredibly effective for landlords who have decided use it.

Now, I can totally see why this would work. Not necessarily because of the fines, but actually, just because of the confrontation. Like the earlier example showed, people are much less willing to leave dog poop behind if they know someone is actually watching. It’s the same kind of peer pressure move that the woman offering the bags was using.

While it sounds kind of like the sort of thing you’d hear about on CSI (“We’ve matched the dog poop to his dog, so he’s definitely the killer!”) I could actually see this sort of thing catching on. And I think it’s kind of a good thing, because it allows for landlords to be more comfortable having tenants with dogs. It kind of sucks when there’s only one tenant making the messes, but all tenants with dogs end up taking the blame simply because there’s no proof of who’s responsible.

Dec
09

Yeah, 100+ dogs is definitely too many for one person

There can be a lot of debate about how many dogs a single person is equipped to handle, but while 101 Dalmatians is a fun movie, I don’t think anybody would ever claim that you should have that many dogs in real life. One is okay, two is fine, three can work for a single person depending on the space available and size of the dogs and so on, but… Well, in my opinion, if you’re living alone and you’ve hit 10 dogs, it’s time to stop and seriously think about what you’re doing, whatever your living situation might be.

Obviously, the woman in this article didn’t do that. She let things get completely out of control, until when the Humane Society actually came to her house to rescue the dogs, there were a good 106 dogs in need of various levels of medical care just to stay alive.

And that’s what always gets me about cases like this. When you see them on shows like Hoarders, it’s usually cats more often than dogs, but the principle is always the same. The person hoarding all the animals always claims that they love said animals, while somehow being completely able to ignore the fact that they’re starving to death or covered in fleas or that puppies or kittens are dying in the house.

I… I’ve just never understood how these people can stand around and not really do anything about it, even when they’re seeing dead baby animals everywhere. Who isn’t upset by dead baby animals?! It’s like the most basic test for human decency. Even hardened criminals don’t want to see dead baby animals!

Like, I think most people could probably be convinced to stay and neuter their pets just by hearing the details of one of these cases, let alone actually living in the situation!

Anyway, I do get that people like this are mentally ill, so I can see why they aren’t actually pressing criminal charges against the woman in this case, and are instead opting to effectively ban her from owning dogs. They are going to actively check up on her to make sure she doesn’t do it again anyway. I’d kind of be a bit happier if she’d been ordered to have some kind of counseling, because she does clearly have some kind of mental illness, one that she might well not be able to get treatment for on her own even if she wanted it.

At least the dogs are safe, though. The article goes into detail about the sort of shape the dogs were in when they were found, and it’s pretty disturbing. In addition to the usual infections and parasites that come about these situations, they also mention a few dogs having actual broken bones (!) Fortunately, they’re all getting treatment for their medical problems.

As for what’s going to happen now, the dogs are  going to be divided up and sent to a mixture of foster homes and shelters in the area, which makes sense. I don’t think any shelter in the world would be equipped to handle a sudden influx of 100 dogs all at once.

I hope that all of them manage to find good homes.

Dec
05

Dogs for diabetics; dog PTSD

So, today’s two articles continue the trend of wildly different dog stories.

The first article is about something I mentioned back in the cancer-sniffing dog post: dogs trained to help diabetics, by alerting them when they have low blood sugar. Pretty impressive, I think. The article is actually an interview with an expert in training these dogs, and there were a few things that I found pretty interesting.

Apparently, while the dogs are trained to recognize a scent that any diabetic would produce when their blood sugar is crashing, the dogs are really only meant to respond to a specific person, and are much more successful at monitoring a person they have a bond with. I can see why that would be the case; I think most dogs are more attuned to their humans than just any old human!

However, on occasion, some of the dogs still try to alert random strangers to the fact that their blood sugar is low, which the interviewee mentions has the potential to be kind of awkward. Which I can totally also see — imagine you have a blood-sugar-tracking dog and it starts trying to alert some stranger about their low blood sugar. What would you say? “Uh… you don’t know me and this might sound weird, but… my dog has been trained to smell crashing blood sugar in diabetics. You should probably get medical attention right away.”

I mean, you’d kind of have to say something, but there’s not really any way to do it that isn’t a bit weird. Maybe if more diabetics become aware of these dogs, it’ll make things less awkward.

The second article is kind of on the sad side — it’s about the increasing number of dogs being diagnosed with PTSD. Now, you might be thinking of poor, unfortunate dogs who have been horribly mistreated by their owners, or something similar, but while that might be possible, the article is specifically about dogs used in combat zones (for sniffing out bombs and such).

Apparently, the idea of dog PTSD has only really been floating around for about 18 months or so, but I have to say, it seems perfectly reasonable to me. Dogs are just as capable of being traumatized by explosions and gunfire and seeing their human comrades dying! Sure, they’d express it in ways specific to dogs, but there’s no reason to assume that a combat zone wouldn’t have a negative effect on them as well.

Actually, from what the article implied, it sounds like dogs actually have some symptoms that are pretty similar to PTSD in humans. As in, some dogs become hyper-vigilant, others just kind of shut down and stop wanting to do anything (!), some experience wild changes in temperment, etc.

Anyway, there is a note of hope to the story: apparently there are already treatments being used on the dogs that seem to be helping them return to normal. I’m glad that this is the case, but it sounded like some of the dogs were being treated simply in order to make them well enough to go back into combat, which I’m a bit less enthusiastic about. I don’t really think any PTSD sufferer — human or canine — should be undergo treatment only to be forced back into combat!

Dec
03

Dog defies death; cuddly puppies relieve law student stress

I read two interesting dog stories today. The first is in a similar vein to the therapy dogs I talked about a few days ago — apparently, George Mason University’s law students were so horribly stressed about exams that the faculty there felt the need to come up with a better solution. A cuddlier solution.

So, they arranged for a group of puppies in need of homes to be brought in to interact with the students. The stressed out students got a break and a chance to relax a bit, while the puppies got to be petted and have a chance at finding a new home.

Personally, I think this is a great idea, and one that shouldn’t be limited to either law students or the patients I talked about in the therapy dogs post. Imagine if your average workplace bothered to do things like this during especially stressful periods? I know that an opportunity to pet a puppy would be a huge boost to my day!

I also think that the dogs-in-need angle is something that the therapy dog system didn’t really address. I mean, it’s great to have these trained dogs to interact with patients, but I really don’t think dogs need to be trained to help relieve stress in normal people outside of a special hospital environment. As long as the dogs have the right temperment (not too afraid of strangers, etc.) I think that they’d been fine in most cases. Doing it this way kills two birds with one stone — the stressed people get some time out, while the dogs get to meet some potential pet owners who will probably be far more interested in adopting after they’ve come to associate the dogs with relaxation.

The other story is one of those that on the one hand is happy, but on the other hand still leaves me thinking about some not-so-happy things. The dog in question, who has since been named Daniel, was scheduled to be put down by animal control. Not because he’d bitten someone or demonstrated himself to be a danger, or anything — it was just another unfortunate case of too many dogs without homes. In fact, it sounds like there were other dogs scheduled to be put down with him.

However, even after being put in the gas box, he survived anyway. They managed to find him a home the next day, and he’s apparently already been on TV.

They aren’t entirely sure why he survived. It seems that it can happen if the dog is breathing differently, or if he’s put in the chamber with other dogs, or for any number of reasons. (The more specific the article got, the more disturbing it sounds!)

Anyway, the reason that this story is only sort of happy for me is that it makes me happy that this one dog survived — but, um, it also kind of makes me think about all the dogs that didn’t survive (and in general, don’t survive). Daniel got a home the next day — what if all those dogs had people who just needed another day? Gah. Disturbing thought, no?

Also, the story does make me a bit concerned about the safety / effectiveness of the methods these people are using to put down dogs. I know why they do have to be put down, though I hate that it’s sometimes necessary, but… I do think we need to make sure that they aren’t suffering unnecessarily due to inept methods!

 

Nov
29

Sometimes, even just contact with a dog helps

We’ve all heard of service dogs, who can help the blind or otherwise disabled with their skills. We’ve also heard of dogs who help sniff out drugs for the police, or, if you’ve read my post from a week cancerous patients for doctors. These dogs are incredibly impressive, but it takes years of training for them to develop the skills they have. It’s not the sort of thing your average dog owner could necessarily go out and train their dog to do easily.

However, that doesn’t mean they can’t be trained to help at all! This article talks about a woman who had her dogs trained to be therapy dogs. Not full service dogs, just therapy dogs.

What’s the difference? Well, therapy dogs just come to hospitals and other places and allow people to pet them. When they’ve been especially well trained, patients might brush them or play games.

It might sound simple, and in a way it kind of is. However, the dogs do need a minimal amount of training to learn how to act in that environment, and of course, they also need to have the temperment to interact with tons of new people all the time. They need to be able to sit and be petted when necessary, and so on.

Personally, if I’m ever stuck in the hospital for a long period of time, I definitely want my dog to be allowed in. Or at least a dog. I can definitely see why having dogs visit would be a big help in that kind of stressful situation.

Nov
27

World’s oldest dogs

So, I’ve been looking at Wikipedia’s list of oldest dogs, hoping to see if there are any patterns. Here’s a condensed version of the list:

1. Bluey, an Australian cattle dog, 29 years old (deceased)
2. Bella*, a labrador, 29 years old (deceased)
3. Teddy*, a poodle, 28 years old (deceased)
4. Max, a terrier, 28 years old (living)
5. Bramble, a border collie, 27 years old (deceased)
6. Adjutant, another labrador, 27 years old (deceased)
7. Butch, a beagle, 27 years old (deceased)
8. Minius, a mixed breed dog, 26 years old (living)
9. Smokey, a shin tzu, 25 years old (living)
10. Sugar, an unknown type of dog, 24 years old (deceased)
11. Piccolo, a mongrel, 23  years old (deceased)
12. Chanel, a dachshund, 21 years old (deceased)
13. Otto, a mix of dachshund and terrier, 20 years old (deceased)
14. Heidi, another dachshund, 20 years old (living)

* the wikipedia article has these two switched, despite saying that Bella was 29 while Teddy was 28. Not really sure why.

Anyway, as you can see from the list, the dogs who lives to an extraordinarily long age are all of different breeds, so it seems like there isn’t much of a pattern there. The wikipedia article mentions that Bluey, the amazingly long-lived 29-year-old Australian cattle dog, prompted a study by scientists trying to determine whether there was anything about cattle dogs that made them more long-lived than other dogs, but it apparently turned up nothing special.

You might notice that there’s only one mutt on the list. This could be significant, but… I tend to think not. The one thing you have to remember when looking at any list of this kind is that these are the dogs whose ages could be verified. Pure-bred dogs are way more likely to have an official birthday that’s not only known to the actual owner, but recorded somewhere, while your average mutt tends not to. So, you could get a mutt from the pound whose age is unknown, and have it live to be 20 or so without even knowing. I’m pretty sure this had an effect on what dogs make up the official lists.

You’ll also see a similar pattern in the countries the dogs hail from (you can see that on the actual wikipedia list). Over half the dogs are from the US, while another significant portion are from the UK. Now, while there might be something about these two countries that is better for dog lifespan, I’m betting that there are just better records and such.

I really wish that there was more information about how the dogs lived their lives. Like, what kind of food did they eat? How much exercise did they get? How many other dogs lived in the same home?

It’s that kind of information that could let all our dogs live to be 20, 25, or 30, I think.

Nov
22

Talk about not cool…

I have to say, I’d heard of things like tail and ear clipping before, but devocalization is a new one for me. If, like me before I read that article, you’ve never heard of the process before, well, it’s exactly what it sounds like. Dog goes in and has its vocal cords cut >.<  After the procedure, the dog can’t bark ever again.

I… don’t even really know what to say about that. I get that a barking dog can be annoying, but seriously?? Having your dog’s vocal cords cut? Really? I just don’t see who would ever come up with this as a solution. How could anyone do that to the dog who loves and trusts them?

Apparently, the procedure has risks even beyond the obvious ones that accompany any surgical procedure — if your dog undergoes this devocalization procedure, they won’t be able to properly receive anesthesia for any other procedure they might need in the future, since the devocalization process actual messes up the throat too much. So, in exchange for a dog who makes a horrible wheezing noise instead of barking, you get to prevent your dog from being able to receive actual live-saving surgery at some point in the future.

I don’t usually like to get all judge-y on the choices people make about their pets, but… gah, this whole thing just sounds so horrible. Dogs bark! You can train them to bark or not bark at appropriate times, even if it’s a bit difficult with some. Maybe some people can’t afford dog training, but anyone who can afford devocalization most certainly has the money for it.

Bah. I hope that one day, people who have their dogs devocalized have burglars break into their houses and not realize it, ’cause they went out their way to have their dogs’ warning systems destroyed. Would serve them right.

Nov
20

Cancer-sniffing Dogs?

Here’s one of those things that I would never have come up with in a million years, but that seemed so obvious when I heard about it: cancer-sniffing dogs.

I mean, we’ve all heard of drug-sniffing dogs and bomb-sniffing dogs, but you don’t usually think about using dogs in a medical diagnostic context. On the other hand, detecting trace compounds is definitely something dogs are great at. It isn’t that surprising that cancer could subtly change a person’s smell in a way a dog would recognize.

What kind of surprised me, though, was the bit where they said that apparently cancer researchers aren’t all that interested in making use of the cancer-sniffing dogs. Apparently, they’d be interested in using the idea to come up with a cancer-sniffing machine, but not the dogs themselves.

Now I can definitely see why you’d want to figure out how to make a machine that can do this — obviously, it’s much quicker and easier to build a machine than it is a cancer-sniffing dog. Apparently, the full working dog training process can take years. However, it seems to me that they should still make use of the dogs for now. The machine is a great idea, but it doesn’t actually exist. The dogs and their training process are already available.

It seems to me that if given the choice between being sniffed by a dog or nothing, I’d totally take the dog. Actually, if they can get it to a high degree of accuracy, it could be a pretty non-invasive low-level test. The sort of thing that they might do before making you go through the more painful and expensive biopsy-type stuff. Frankly, I’d rather see a dog at the doctor’s office than a machine any day.

This also has me wondering about the other possibilities for dogs’ noses. If dogs can detect cancer, could they detect other diseases? Can a dog smell heart disease? Celiac disease? Diabetes?

Actually, the article mentioned that some dogs can be trained to monitor the health of diabetics. They can actually smell low blood sugar (or the compounds the body emits when blood sugar is crashing, rather).

Personally, I think that’s pretty cool. I know that they’re pretty reluctant to do much more research on this, but I really hope someone does. It could not only save lives, but make a trip to the doctor for a diagnostic test much less unpleasant.

There’s much more info in the article, so I’d definitely recommend checking it out.

Older posts «